Also let's add its been 36 years since football won a I-AA National Title, and that crazy long drought looks like it may never end......
RoanokeGreensboro80 liked this
Affirm, good thoughts. Here is an example of when I said many others. Just looking at the ACC. Only 1.5 weeks into the season the ACC has lost 17 times to mid-majors. 10 different ACC teams have mid-major losses. Another point is baseball is the only major sports where Power teams play at mid-majors.Affirm wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 4:50 pmApaladin writes many good and interesting and helpful things on the UFFP, but affirm does not like apaladin's incessant comments about baseball and usually ignores them.
Saying that baseball gives mid-majors the best chance to compete with the big boys is irrelevant. He names a couple of examples and says there are many others. He does not say how many others there actually are, so who knows how many such scores there are in a season, compared to the total number of games mid-majors have against "the big boys". It may be a relatively small number. A D1 team can play up to 56 games in a regular season, so a lot of games have to be scheduled within approximately the same number of weeks as are in the football and basketball seasons. Big boys have to schedule nearby games (such as WFU vs. UNCG) in many cases because of all the travel that would be involved otherwise, expensive in both time and money for the visiting team when the game is far away.
The percentage of mid-major wins against big boys may be no higher than the percentage is for FCS wins vs FBS in football or the percentage of mig-majors wins vs major conference teams in basketball; and if it is higher, it is not much higher and can usually be explained because the big boys are needing to rest pitchers for more important games. Basically the big boys in baseball do not even take the mid-major opponents very seriously, because the big boys have so many subequent chances to bounce back in upcoming imporrtant games. Most importantly, when a mid-major team does beat a big boy team in baseball, very few people even know about it, it is not big news, and it is essentially irrelevant. When a mid-major beats a big boy in basketball, people know and people remember. The same is equally or even more true when it happens in football. In baseball, no one really cares. It is merely an interesting but trivial and irrelevant occurence that very few people even notice. A mid-major team can somehow beat a big boy in baseball and be terrible the rest of the season, when it really matters. The best chance to compete? What does that even mean? To compete in one single basically meaningless game? "To compete against the 'big boys'" is no reason for wanting Furman to reinstate baseball, all things considered.
"Thought so"??
It's always hilarious to see you get all worked up over the dumbest shit dude.........Choir Boy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 3:25 pmSo says a jock sniffer who worships a ball team that has one conference championship in what 22 years? Winning 20 games a year ain’t squat with no Rings or Ships….just validates that maybe we should play a harder non conference schedule minus the cupcakes to prepare for the all mighty SoCon
UR1SMFer
Louis Tully wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:51 pmYour reference to Furman Football as pee wee ball is the most egregiously insulting reference to any of our Athletic Programs that I have read on these pages in the last 20+ years.
Well said LTLouis Tully wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:51 pmYour reference to Furman Football as pee wee ball is the most egregiously insulting reference to any of our Athletic Programs that I have read on these pages in the last 20+ years.
FU Hoopla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:18 pmAnd 99.5% of your kool aid induced posts on bball don’t substantiate an world class basketball program that has won ONE ring in 42 yearsLouis Tully wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:51 pmYour reference to Furman Football as pee wee ball is the most egregiously insulting reference to any of our Athletic Programs that I have read on these pages in the last 20+ years.
I hope we win it all in Ash next week. I will be there maybe we can get together and u can suck my nuts rather than feign to hit them?
Let me know I am staying at the Grove Park Inn
And it was a most deserved reference at that...........
Anybody that wants to constantly diss the hoops program like choir boy is going to get hit back square in the nuts.......![]()
Literally 80% of the posts he makes are egregiously insulting to the hoops program........
So yeah, move up to FBS or deal with the consequences of not...................
Choir Boy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:30 pmWell said LTLouis Tully wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 5:51 pmYour reference to Furman Football as pee wee ball is the most egregiously insulting reference to any of our Athletic Programs that I have read on these pages in the last 20+ years.
It all started when he said Furman Football was a dumpster after last season….and the azz clown has gone hill ever since
Rumor is he his Bob Richey’s house boy
Actually baseball has been to 2 NCAA tournaments in the last 34 years. 1991 and 2005.Choir Boy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 5:36 pmThe baseball team had been to the same number of post season NCAA tournaments as the basketball team has over the last 40 years…….OneAffirm wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 4:50 pmApaladin writes many good and interesting and helpful things on the UFFP, but affirm does not like apaladin's incessant comments about baseball and usually ignores them.
Saying that baseball gives mid-majors the best chance to compete with the big boys is irrelevant. He names a couple of examples and says there are many others. He does not say how many others there actually are, so who knows how many such scores there are in a season, compared to the total number of games mid-majors have against "the big boys". It may be a relatively small number. A D1 team can play up to 56 games in a regular season, so a lot of games have to be scheduled within approximately the same number of weeks as are in the football and basketball seasons. Big boys have to schedule nearby games (such as WFU vs. UNCG) in many cases because of all the travel that would be involved otherwise, expensive in both time and money for the visiting team when the game is far away.
The percentage of mid-major wins against big boys may be no higher than the percentage is for FCS wins vs FBS in football or the percentage of mig-majors wins vs major conference teams in basketball; and if it is higher, it is not much higher and can usually be explained because the big boys are needing to rest pitchers for more important games. Basically the big boys in baseball do not even take the mid-major opponents very seriously, because the big boys have so many subequent chances to bounce back in upcoming imporrtant games. Most importantly, when a mid-major team does beat a big boy team in baseball, very few people even know about it, it is not big news, and it is essentially irrelevant. When a mid-major beats a big boy in basketball, people know and people remember. The same is equally or even more true when it happens in football. In baseball, no one really cares. It is merely an interesting but trivial and irrelevant occurence that very few people even notice. A mid-major team can somehow beat a big boy in baseball and be terrible the rest of the season, when it really matters. The best chance to compete? What does that even mean? To compete in one single basically meaningless game? "To compete against the 'big boys'" is no reason for wanting Furman to reinstate baseball, all things considered.