Situations like that have happened before. Mid-majors have consistently been excluded. In other cases, teams have won their conference tourneys but gotten seeds that indicated they likely would not have gotten an at-large bid.The Jackal wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 12:25 pmIf that scenario plays out, I think Furman would be 31-4. If they keep out a team with that record, then I'm not sure what to say.CharlieFU wrote: ↑Tue Dec 18, 2018 11:46 amSadly, even if we beat LSU, I think we do not win at large bid, unless MAYBE we go 16-2 in the SoCon, and make it to finals of SoCon tourney. Too early to talk about this.
It would be great if we could win socon regular season championship, which guarantees an NIT bid.
Just keep winning!
One comparison would be Stephen F Austin in 2013, who went 26-3 in the regular season, with 3 away losses (Texas A&M, average conference opponent, bad conference opponent) and a win over Oklahoma, who got an at-large as a 10 seed. SFA lost in the 2nd round of their conference by 2 points and was not even a bubble team for the NCAA tournament.
Another example would be 2016 St. Mary's, who went 25-4 in the regular season, beat Gonzaga twice, and a solid BYU team, and lost to Gonzaga in the WCC conference finals. They were excluded and finished #34 in Pomeroy (it's very common for non-power schools to be excluded despite ranking in the top 40 of the computer rankings). St. Mary's was excluded again last year with a 27-4 regular season schedule, wins against NM State, BYU, and 4-seed Gonzaga, and #32 in Pomeroy.
Basically, Furman is not going to get an at-large bid under essentially any circumstances, other than not losing a single game until a close SoCon tourney final loss to Wofford or UNC-G, which is so improbable as to not really matter. The team's chances to just win the SoCon tourney are thousands of times higher.