Bootie wrote: ↑Thu Oct 25, 2018 4:53 pm
sluggo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 25, 2018 4:09 pm
affirm wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:53 pm
I still do not see Sluggo’s clear and serious answer on what he means by “fix it.”. My definition of fix it would be, as I’ve previously written, do what it takes (not impossible) to successfully compete (win more than lose) against a group of teams that include Wofford, Citadel, Mercer, and Samford, plus the likes of Elon, Colgate, and Richmond (whenever we have occasion to play those).
The problem is money.
Beating SoCon teams doesn't fix the problem because there is not enough money in SoCon football games anymore.
15 year Plan simplified:
1. Say FU to the SoCon
2. Go independent
3.
Try to play 5 FBS
away games per year (yes, record will be 5-6 and worse for a few years)
After 5 years
4. Expand Paladin Stadium to 22k seats
5 . Book smaller FBS (App, Marshal, Coastal) at home and bigger FBS away and top FCS at home (North D State etc...)
After 5 years
6. Expand Paladin Stadium to 35k seats
7 . Book small FBS and medium FBS at home and bigger FBS away and top FCS at home (North D State etc...)
After 5 years
8. Expand Paladin Stadium to 45k seats
9. Now become FBS
10. Join an FBS conference
That can be spun with different numbers and time periods but that's the basic idea.
It's about schedule and stadium capacity.
Schedule draws the crowd, capacity allows you to make more money.
Times have changed; we can't keep expecting big crowds to show up for Wofford and PC games.
Time to get over that; because that is over.
App, GS and Marshal left the SoCon because of money.
Half of the conference left and It's like we can't read the writing on the wall.
Interesting. Seems like a tough ask to be a 5-6 team and also justify increasing stadium size to hold a crowd that's likely not showing up anyway. The other thing I wonder is, of all FBS schools, what is the smallest enrollment, and how does the size of the student body play into that... is it possible to have a FBS football program with the small student body and alumni base as Furman has.
35 years ago the stadium was packed and failure to expand it then is one reason the crowd got smaller.
People got tired of not being able to get a ticket for a decent game, so they just gave up.
There were never enough students at Furman to fill the stadium; that's an imaginary factor.
Fans fill the stadium not students and alumni. Clemson has 25k studentsl not 80k.
Get fans by playing teams that people want to see Furman play.
Nobody cares about a Furman VS PC,Wofford,Elon,ETSU,WC,VMI game anymore.
Just give up on that dead schedule; it's over with. I'm a big fan but don't want to see those games anymore.
If the recruits feel like I do then it's a BIG problem with getting top players signed.
Season tickets have minimal attraction because the home schedule is weak.
Fans rather save the money and travel to the
one big game per year.
Fu football is in a situation where it's not "who you are" but "who you play".
Who we play has everything to do with shrinking crowds and who we play is limited by not having enough
seats to play bigger programs.
We have to sell the venue; not just the team.
We need "big" games at home to sell the venue.
There are
zero big games at home and it's been that way for over 15 years.
This program is circling the drain but every idea to plug the drain is met with extreme skepticism and sometimes asinine insults.
And that is be the biggest problem with change.
Furman should have moved to the ACC in 1953 and the move would have paid for itself 100 times over by now.
But no, the same negative talk we have today is what was said back then, so seeking the bottom is a pattern in FU football. Division II is the most likely next step for Furman because everything I said will be treated as foolish talk.
Then it will be non-scholarship football and then the program will just be ended forever.
I think this way because the trend has been downward since 1953.
Playing PC at PC was the lowest I ever sank to see a game. I hope to never do that again.
What a gigantic let down.
Look at the chart further down this page which shows the history of the Southern Conference membership:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Conference
That chart explains everything I said in the original post of this thread.
Now match up the years on that chart with Clemson's stadium expansions :
81,500 (2007–present)
81,473 (1991–2006)
79,575 (1988–1990)
79,854 (1986–1987)
74,724 (1985)
73,915 (1983–1984)
57,307 (1982)
53,306 (1978–1981)
43,451 (1963–1977)
43,309 (1960–1962)
40,000 (1958–1959)
20,500 (1942–1957) It only took 5 seasons in the ACC before they NEEDED to expand.
No logical reason why the same would not have happened for Furman at the same time because it happened to every other team that joined.
Wake Forest is still only 35k seats but still booking the home games with Clemson and the like.
So the 3 year plan is :
Build 35k seats and play bigger teams at home to
sell the venue.
But yeah;
that's just crazy is all I'm going to hear about that.
No matter the clear facts, it's just a waste of breath because of the internal resistance and fear of failure.
But failure is coming anyway at the current rate of decline.
So why not give it a shot by making some more cheaply built seats.
Make the seats cheap enough to tear down if everyone feels embarrassed if the plan fails.
I seriously doubt it would fail since FBS teams still put us on the schedule anyway; but they can only play us 1/2 as
much because they can only play us at their home.
I'll be impressed with AI when AI wins a SoCon football championship.