No…you agree with FUBeAR entirely. That’s why FUBeAR used PC & Valdosta in his example. Valdosta would probably beat PC 69-0, but the Committee sees Furman beating PC by 1 as INFINITELY superior to beating Valdosta by 69.The Jackal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 2:13 pmI sort of agree with you, but sort of not.FUBeAR wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 1:07 pmSounds good, 60…but not true.
Seeding matters. If we win the SoCon - let’s say we go 7-1 (as ETSU did in 2021) … and we give Clemson a decent game…let’s say it’s a 35-17 loss. OK, we’re 8-2. Now, if we play PC and win (even if the score is 14-13), that gives us a 9-2 record and, most likely…a seed…a bye…a 2nd round home playoff game…all those things matter…don’t they?
But…what if we play D2 National Finalist/Runner-Up, Valdosta State (instead of PC), and beat them 69-0. Know what the Playoff Selection Committee thinks of that? Nothing…absolutely nothing. To them, our record is still 8-2 with no FBS wins and that nagging loss to whichever SoCon beat us….Sorry…not quite worthy of a seed, Paladins…and, sorry, but Richmond outbid you for your 1st round matchup. If you’re able to overcome the Spiders (be good to see Udinski & Herres again, huh?), then you get to go to Fargo to play #1 Seed NDSU in your 2nd round game….which would have been at Furman vs. Davidson (who beat Elon in Rd1)…if only you would have played and beaten D1 PC by 1 point…instead of blowing out D2 Valdosta.
The system sux…but it is what it is…and who we play does matter…way more than it should .
I do agree that who you play matters insofar as it really needs to be D1 competition. I do not really believe it matters who you play inside that D1 category.
In FBS football, there is incentives for the top programs to play one another. That really isn't the case in the FCS. Most programs would be better off playing the weakest non-conference FCS teams they can find as it adds a tally to the "D1 win" category.
The issue with scheduling, as I see it, is that every team wants (1) ease of travel (2) beatable FCS opponent. There are only so many such programs, and every other playoff-hungry FCS team is trying to schedule the same opponents.
Even without trying, you'll eventually get back around where you have to schedule a D2 or an NAIA. The alternative, I guess, is to go the route where the same two or three teams pop up on the schedule nearly every season (Elon, Gardner Webb, etc.)
OOC Strength of schedule is not going to matter as long as all OOC opponents are D1, unless you happen to play & defeat a Team that happens to end up a Top 5 Team…which because of the circular logic of computer & people rankings means a Big Sky or MVFC Team…which hardly makes sense financially…and you could catch them in a down year and your challenging contest end up meaning bupkus.
Nope…better to schedule every OOC game with a Non-Schollie D1 (PFL) or a Transitional Team. Problem is…the MVFC & The Big Sky have realized this and can pay more than most SoCon Teams. Check out their schedules last year and coming up….Dixie State, Drake, Valpo, St. Thomas, San Diego….all over their 5 and 6 Playoff bids!
System sux…we are in full agreement, Jackal…as always!
Affirm liked this
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers,
For he today who sheds his blood with me shall be my brother
For he today who sheds his blood with me shall be my brother