Coaches (with typical contracts) can’t afford to think “long-term” or really about “long-term effects” past the 2nd year of their contracts, regardless of their performance in the 1st 2 years. If you doubt that, FUBeAR will be happy to link some examples demonstrating such…won’t have to go too far to find them.
Free Agency is based on contracts which have term lengths and often ‘buyer’ option years. Scholarships are annually renewable agreements which schools/Teams must fulfill and ‘Student-Athletes’ can renege on their end of the ‘deal’ at any time without notice and without penalty or restriction. Free Agency can be planned for/around. The whims of young men under 23 years old cannot. Not a valid comparison at all.
There is no historical precedent for the current environment of College Football. We really cannot look to the past (2 years ago) and say that the right thing to do then is the right thing to do now…other than treating young men as well & as honestly as you can given the environment that has changed & was changed, in theory, to benefit them.
Free Agency is based on contracts which have term lengths and often ‘buyer’ option years. Scholarships are annually renewable agreements which schools/Teams must fulfill and ‘Student-Athletes’ can renege on their end of the ‘deal’ at any time without notice and without penalty or restriction. Free Agency can be planned for/around. The whims of young men under 23 years old cannot. Not a valid comparison at all.
There is no historical precedent for the current environment of College Football. We really cannot look to the past (2 years ago) and say that the right thing to do then is the right thing to do now…other than treating young men as well & as honestly as you can given the environment that has changed & was changed, in theory, to benefit them.
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers,
For he today who sheds his blood with me shall be my brother
For he today who sheds his blood with me shall be my brother