"Furman football blows out WCU in spring season opener." https://www.postandcourier.com/greenvil ... f2564.html
dornb liked this
It was. I do think our offense has plenty of quick strike in it. We saw a few chunk plays downfield early.AstroDin wrote: ↑Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:15 pmIMO maybe the biggest part of Furman's dominating play yesterday was the drive chart.
The scoring drives;
9-65 (3:47)
9-87 (4:31)
10-89 (4:32)
12-93 (3:31)
17-74 (8:59)
In years past we've reeled off a lot of big plays. The Wofford game last year - we had one big run for our only score. Yesterday was like a death by a thousand cuts. This team will get some scores off big plays - we have the playmakers to do it. But - yesterday for not playing in over 440 days the Dins played in control and almost error free.
Hendrix addressed this.apaladin wrote: ↑Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:50 pmThe only 2 negatives I saw were kickoffs/kickoff coverage and punt returns. I think they returned every kick snd out past the thirty. We are used to hardly ever having a ko returned. Instead of kicking it deep in the end zone, we are now kicking it to the 10. We let too many punts hit and roll 20-30 yards.
So does that mean he could have 2 more years?AstroDin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 8:20 amThey said on the radio McKoy has a meniscus injury, I assume he's had surgery. McKoy hasn't taken a redshirt so if he rehabilitates well he could play in the fall if he chooses.
The Dins are stacked at Bandit > Hope, Agbenou, and Luke Clark. Not saying it wouldn't be helpful to have Elijah out there too.
Wow, that is really great if we can keep it up. If we want to go with methodical, long, soul killing drives avoiding penalties is crucial. Opposing coaches are betting that you can’t run play after play without screwing up with either a turnover, a sack or, more commonly, penalties that kill the drive. And most coaches actually lack confidence in their own offenses in this regard which leads them to go for big plays rather than the grinding drives. So far I LOVE where we appear to be heading with this sort of old fashioned approach.The Jackal wrote: ↑Mon Feb 22, 2021 11:59 amAlso, one pretty incredible stat.
Furman had 1 offensive penalty for 5 yards.
Have not played in 440+ days, offense isn't huddling, changing pace, constant substitutions and personnel groups, second and third teamers played much of the game, and only one penalty.
I love the play, but it kinda looks like wretched defense. The DE played too wide and the DT kinda went towards the A gap, so the only defenders with a chance on this 46ish thing are those 2 lbs (or whatever they are) who stay 4 or 5 yards deep. Then one of them gets bulldozed while the other misses the tackle. But I’m hoping that is an example of the fact that nobody’s defense is set up to handle simple stuff like this anymore. The second level guys aren’t recruited to stop a bunch of big dudes running straight at them.The Jackal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:02 amWhen you talk about an experienced offensive line, I think this play sort of helps emphasize that.
It's a relatively simple design on a run play - LG pulls around, looks inside for a linebacker, fullback leads the tailback looking to kick out the next defender to show his face, tailback follows the caravan, breaks a tackle and accelerates to the outside.
WCU brings extra bodies against this run look. A lot of teams are going to do this to us. They send three guys to the center's left. After the LG pulls, there are only two guys there to block three rushers.
I'm sure Bear can give the specific terminology, but watch the backside - LT (Tomlin, I believe). He has to fill the hole vacated by the LG and steps near laterally inside. The center, Jumper, steps backside and seals both the DT and blitzing linebacker. Feeling that Jumper has sealed the inside, Tomlin peels back and gets a block on the DE - the only man yet to be blocked in this design.
Without that second block, the DE probably blows the play up in the backfield. Tomlin gets to him right before he gets his mitts on Wynn. Not sure if that's the design, but great awareness and athleticism to step that hard inside, block a man, and then peel back to one of the defense's most athletic players.
A lot of teams might fill the backside guard's with the fullback. Furman's coaches seem confident that their linemen can sort all of this out and can spare the fullback to get there "firstest with the mostest." The last thing any defensive backfield wants to see is 300 lbs Krober followed by 245 lbs Roberto followed by 216 lbs Wynn. Good night.
By the way, if you are looking for other wrinkles, watch Deluca bubble out at the bottom of the screen. If teams are going to crash that hard into the backfield, look for us to start quickly swinging the ball out to the edge.
Every Football person should LOVE this play - it’s Power...old-school basic Football & unstoppable if executed properly.Furmanoid wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:37 amI love the play, but it kinda looks like wretched defense. The DE played too wide and the DT kinda went towards the A gap, so the only defenders with a chance on this 46ish thing are those 2 lbs (or whatever they are) who stay 4 or 5 yards deep. Then one of them gets bulldozed while the other misses the tackle. But I’m hoping that is an example of the fact that nobody’s defense is set up to handle simple stuff like this anymore. The second level guys aren’t recruited to stop a bunch of big dudes running straight at them.The Jackal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:02 amWhen you talk about an experienced offensive line, I think this play sort of helps emphasize that.
It's a relatively simple design on a run play - LG pulls around, looks inside for a linebacker, fullback leads the tailback looking to kick out the next defender to show his face, tailback follows the caravan, breaks a tackle and accelerates to the outside.
WCU brings extra bodies against this run look. A lot of teams are going to do this to us. They send three guys to the center's left. After the LG pulls, there are only two guys there to block three rushers.
I'm sure Bear can give the specific terminology, but watch the backside - LT (Tomlin, I believe). He has to fill the hole vacated by the LG and steps near laterally inside. The center, Jumper, steps backside and seals both the DT and blitzing linebacker. Feeling that Jumper has sealed the inside, Tomlin peels back and gets a block on the DE - the only man yet to be blocked in this design.
Without that second block, the DE probably blows the play up in the backfield. Tomlin gets to him right before he gets his mitts on Wynn. Not sure if that's the design, but great awareness and athleticism to step that hard inside, block a man, and then peel back to one of the defense's most athletic players.
A lot of teams might fill the backside guard's with the fullback. Furman's coaches seem confident that their linemen can sort all of this out and can spare the fullback to get there "firstest with the mostest." The last thing any defensive backfield wants to see is 300 lbs Krober followed by 245 lbs Roberto followed by 216 lbs Wynn. Good night.
By the way, if you are looking for other wrinkles, watch Deluca bubble out at the bottom of the screen. If teams are going to crash that hard into the backfield, look for us to start quickly swinging the ball out to the edge.