If they are going to college all week, it very possibly would be online courses or sitting in classes or seminars or labs, etc., where everyone is >6’ apart and masked. But you know how close together they are in the huddles, and on sideline situations with coaches and teammates. Also you know how close they are to the opposing team’s players throughout the entire game. In addition, cheerleaders, coaches, officials, et. al., do get very, very close together. It is NOT just spectators - in fact, zero spectators are “essential participants”. Any game can be played with zero spectators, but any game of the sort we are considering involves numerous participants as I have pointed out.Furmanoid wrote: ↑Fri Apr 17, 2020 2:16 pmNo point in making players or cheerleaders wear them. If they are going to college all week they are gonna get exposed so it doesn’t matter what they do on game day. You mainly just don’t want to infect 4000 spectators and then have them scatter all over SC and GA.
But boy, if a 1/4 full outdoor breezy stadium is too dangerous I don’t see how any number of people could be safe indoors watching b-ball.
... And YES, you are correct to point out that college basketball, which nowadays starts only 2 months after college football, is very much in question for 2020-2021.
I guess if Furman athletics included an intercollegiate Rifle team as 3 SoCon schools do have for men and for women, that is one sport that would be able to proceed, with or without masks.