I was dumbfounded. I did not think Brett was as married to the %^#$ bunt as was his predecessor. OK, first four guys get on, two runs in, now down 5-4 with the damned CLEANUP hitter at the plate, nobody out. Was it OK to bunt here with someone who prolly does not practice it much or well? Maybe. Was it OK to bunt with 2 strikes? HELL NO. He made a pass at a ball that was high and nearly a foot outside, strike 3. Now even if he had gotten it down, successfully, that would be 1 out, runners on 2nd and 3rd. Now they will OF COURSE walk hitter #5 to get a force everywhere and we put the game in the hands of #6 and #7. This was a brain fart of significant value.
While I'm here, have they change the rule such that a batted ball is foul if it strikes home plate?? Seriously?? This call has been made in the last two games I have attended. Kinda renders the Baltimore Chop useless as a strategy. And it was a game changer this time.