Does anyone know what the personal foul was on the kickoff in the second quarter?
"I don't believe in the moon, I think it's just the back of the sun"
He probably was in but the other angle clearly showed he was out. If you only look at one angle then yes but you are supposed to look a all available. It wasn't indisputable. Anyway this now as bad as I feared and getting worse. CU has now scored 35 in 20 mins of game time with plenty of time left.gman wrote: ↑Sat Sep 01, 2018 2:45 pmHe was clearly in. It was the right call. My wife thought the same thing.apaladin wrote: ↑Sat Sep 01, 2018 2:27 pmThe call at the end of the half was BS. The first angle from the end zone showed he was clearly out. They never showed it again. They kept showing the other angle which looked like he was in. So one camera shows in, one shows out where is the indisputable part?? I guess HR was just a token starter. I agree it will be Lincoln and Grainger and very well could be Grainger. I have not been a fan of the play calling today., especially on second down. The few times we had 5 or 6 yds on first down we've come back with a run up the middle for nothing.
We've looked much better against Clemson reserves. That is probably a closer comparison to what we will see against a good FCS team.mathprofhiker wrote: ↑Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:13 pmTouchdown Dins!!! That's probably more TDs than some teams will score against Clemson this year: that defense is really tough, especially up front.
If you buy the argument, Furman's offensive line just played the best defensive line ever.I-85 Paladin wrote: ↑Sat Sep 01, 2018 3:46 pmOverall happy with the foundation I saw. Got a little sloppy in 2nd half but one can only imagine a far more competitive game if our OL could have matched up better but this is the best line we will see all year bar none. I think Grainger made a case.